James Gates writes: > Slony is a replication software that strongly depends on a > specific version of the PostgreSQL RDBMS. As such, > the slony libraries will be placed in the same directory tree > as the corresponding PostgreSQL version. It is an OSS project, > not controlled by Sun, so interface stability can't > be guaranteed.
Using per-version file paths probably makes sense for the libraries, but does embedding under /usr/postgres make sense for the rest of it, particularly for the man pages? Burying the man paths rather than delivering to a common directory seems to make it harder to use. > /usr/postgres/slony/share/slony1_base.sql What does "share" mean again? :-/ -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
