Matthew Ahrens wrote: > Darren.Reed at Sun.COM wrote: > >> What is the interaction between "zfs send" and "zfs receive" >> with the version numbering? >> >> e.g what happens when I "zfs send" with a ZFS filesystem >> of version X but the remote system can only support X-1? > > > The remote system will actually process the 'zfs recv' just fine, but > then not be able to mount the filesystem. Unfortunately, the old code > is what it is and obviously we can't change it now. See bug 6561382.
Is this worth a change to the man page for either of 'zfs send' or 'zfs recv' so that users have something to read before they scratch their heads or pickup the phone? I suppose if this were a full case, that bug would be a TCR for the case...do we have the equivalent for fast-tracks? Darren
