On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 10:51:56AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 09:44:03AM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote: > >> [2] NEEDED 0xba2ea libgnutls.so.12 > >> [3] NEEDED 0xba2fa libgcrypt.so.11 > >> [4] NEEDED 0xba30a libgpg-error.so.0 > > > >So, we're including GnuTLS and friends as well? > > I believe GnuTLS is a Consolidate Private interface in the JDS > consolidation (see the Evolution & JDS ARC cases for the arguments > about why we need yet another encryption library).
Why should it be private? Why shouldn't we ship both, OpenSSL and GnuTLS as supported interfaces that third parties can use? I don't see "yet another encryption library" as bad in this case. Nico --
