Chris Horne wrote: > Hi David > > The properties I am proposing are Solaris properties.
Yes, that was understood. > It looks to me > like OBP IEEE-1275 already supports different block sizes, but chose a > "block-size ( -- block-len )" 'method' implementation in conjunction > with the "deblocker" and "disk-label" standard support packages instead > of a 'property' implementation. Also, it seems to me that using > "block-size" as a Solaris property name, instead of "blksize", might > cause confusion since the Solaris property name would then conflict > with the already defined OBP "block-size" method. > > Please let me know if my understanding is flawed. If you're concerned about confusion because the property namespace may overlap the method namespace (which are independent) then pick a different set of non-cryptic, non-abbreviated self-describing names. -David
