Gary Winiger wrote:

>...
>"\fBCommittee:\fP" 15
>.\"
>.\" List here the names of the committee who participated in the decision.
>.\" List the majority first, in alphabetical order.  Except, place the name
>.\" of the person writing the majority opinion first.  List the minority
>.\" second, after a "." and the word "Minority:".  Again, place the name
>.\" of the author of the minority opinion first, but then alphabetically.
>.\" E.g.: Joe Blow, Allan Able, Charlie Carlson.  Minority: George Wrong,
>.\" Devils Advocate.  List abstentions last.
>.\"
>.\" Interns should not be included in the committee list unless an intern
>.\" wrote the opinion.  In that situation, list the intern in parentheses
>.\" after the case owner.
>.\" E.g.: August Case-Owner (opinion written by Aspiring Intern)
>.\"
>.\" Note that <ARCDIR>/committee contains a list of committee
>.\" members in a form suitable for inclusion here.  The review minutes
>.\" are another source for this information.
>.\"
>.\" Delete those members not present or not participating. Please update
>.\" this opinion template when the membership changes.
>.\"
>  
>

It would make for a more clear understanding if there was mention
in the template that the case owner should be placed first (with the
intern's name in brackets) should the majority opinion be being
written by an intern to a case owner.


>>The project may be delivered in a patch release  of  the  ON
>>consolidation.
>>    
>>
>
>       Please follow the template.  ON is not a release vehicle:
>
>.\"     The classification of the deliverable as a major, minor, micro
>.\"     or patch as defined in Release Taxonomy document and for what
>.\"     product [Solaris, a specific unbundled, ...].
>.\"     E.g.:
>.\"             The project may be delivered in a minor release of Solaris.
>** Appropriate release vehicle(s). **
>  
>

The default opinion template contains this text:

.\"     The classification of the deliverable as a major, minor, micro
.\"     or patch as defined in Release Taxonomy document and for what
.\"     consolidation [ON, JDS, a specific unbundled, ...].
.\"     E.g.:
.\"             The project may be delivered in a minor release of the 
ON consolidation.
** Appropriate release vehicle(s). **

...are you suggesting that the default template should be changed?

Darren


Reply via email to