Mark A. Carlson wrote:
> I am sponsoring this case for Xiao Li. I have marked it closed approved
> automatic based on the checklist in the case directory.
The answers to this section of the checklist do not agree with the exported
interfaces table, and if answered correctly, would be "ARC review required".
> 3.2 Exported Libraries
> Are libraries being delivered by this project?
> [ ] Yes
> [x] No - continue with next section (section 3.3)
>
> Are 64-bit versions of the libraries being delivered?
> [ ] Yes
> [ ] No - ARC review required
>
> Are static versions of the libraries being delivered?
> [ ] Yes - ARC review required
> [ ] No
>> Exported interface Classification Interface type
>> =============================== ============== ==============
>> /usr/lib/libsgutils.so Private Symbolic link
>> /usr/lib/libsgutils.so.1 Private Symbolic link
>> /usr/lib/libsgutils.so.1.0.0 Private Shared library
>> /usr/lib/libsgutils.a Private Static library
>> /usr/lib/libsgutils.la Private Libtool library
>> file
If this is indeed a private library, then not having a 64-bit version
is acceptable, but delivering .a & .la files is not. (If no one else
will link with them, why would they be needed? Even if it's public,
delivering .la files is unacceptable as it causes programs built using
libtool to link incorrectly. If it's private, why is it in /usr/lib?)
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
