LSARC,

Unfortunately, I lost my phone service early on during
yesterday's open meeting.  I was only able to dial in 
during the last few minutes of the open discussion.  I 
had hoped to discuss the permissions issue during the 
meeting.

So how do others see the password permissions issue?

Thanks,

John

On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 09:50, John Fischer wrote:
> Shura,
> 
> This partially answers my question.  The real problem is that
> eclipse creates the password file with 644 permissions and the
> directories with 755 permissions.  In my opinion this is too
> permissive.  It should create the file with 600 or 400 and
> the directories with 700.  Let's discuss this with the rest
> of the committee in 10 minutes.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 09:20, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
> > John, thanks for the explanation.
> > 
> > All dirs Eclipse creates in and including ~/.eclipse has 755 permissions. 
> > Password file is 644.
> > 
> > If I change the permissions to 700 and 600, it is still able to work.
> > 
> > Does it answer your question?
> > 
> > Shura.
> > 
> > On Tuesday 11 November 2008 20:00:37 John Fischer wrote:
> > > Shura,
> > >
> > > Typically these types of directories have permissions of
> > > drwx------.  Sometimes these directories will have permissions
> > > of drwxr-xr-x.  Here are a couple of examples from my home
> > > directory:
> > >
> > > drwxr-xr-x   2 johnf    staff        512 Mar 16  2005 .desktop/
> > > drwxr-xr-x   2 johnf    staff        512 May 22  2003 .dist/
> > > drwxr-xr-x  15 johnf    staff        512 Oct  8 09:20 .dt/
> > >
> > > Now if there is sensitive data stored within the directories
> > > that have the group and other permissions with the read bit
> > > set we need to insure that the password file still has some
> > > level of protection.  Typically these files are only owner
> > > readable (-rw------- (0600) or -r-------- (0400)).  There are
> > > several programs on Solaris that when they notice that the
> > > permissions are not 0600 or 0400 will exit or not use the
> > > file.  Does eclipse provide this level of protection for
> > > the password file it stores in the home directory?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 00:31, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
> > > > On Monday 10 November 2008 19:13:31 John Fischer wrote:
> > > > > Shura,
> > > > >
> > > > > What are the permissions of the directories and
> > > > > file secure_storage?  Assuming that the directories
> > > > > and file permissions are supposed to be readable and
> > > > > writable by the owner only what happens if the
> > > > > permissions are otherwise?
> > > >
> > > > I did not check this scenario. This is an unlikely one, though.
> > > >
> > > > Normally, ~/.* directories and files are configuration files for some
> > > > systems or programs, such as .bashrc, for instance.
> > > >
> > > > Is there a case when such files are not writeable?
> > > >
> > > > Shura.
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 05:56, Alexandre (Shura) Iline wrote:
> > > > > > Hi.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Eclipse simply stores encrypted passwords into a file.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The file is
> > > > > > ~/.eclipse/org.eclipse.equinox.security/secure_storage file.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No security issue here as far as I can see.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Shura.
> > 
> > 
> 


Reply via email to