Going by the FOSS checklist in the case directory:
3.2 Libraries - N/A
Are 64-bit libraries being delivered?
[X] Yes
[ ] No - ARC review required
I would say yes.
-- mark
John Fischer wrote:
> Nico,
>
> Right. However, my question is still does the project
> provide a 64-bit library?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 07:59, Nicolas Williams wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:51:43AM -0800, John Fischer wrote:
>>
>>> I am assuming that since there is a 64-bit include file
>>> that the project will be providing a 64-bit library. Is
>>> that a correct assumption?
>>>
>> There's no such thing as a 64-bit include file. Some of the include
>> files have '64' in their name. But you knew that, and I'm not here to
>> pick nits. The names seem to imply that they are either internal
>> headers (in which case: why are they being delivered?) or else consumers
>> need to access certain types or what have you that differ according to
>> the either the CPUs that are available or, more likely, the instruction
>> used by the application (in which case your question is quite right).
>>
>> Nico
>> --
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20081113/43d6450b/attachment.html>
