Mayuresh Nirhali writes: > Thanks to all who responded to this thread so far. > So, Do we agree that dante cannot be integrated as is into Solaris ?
I can't speak for the others who responded, but I'm not in agreement with that. I think it should integrate, and that it should run as EUID==0 so that it can use PAM. If at all possible (and it certainly _should_ be possible), the daemon should be changed to give up as many privileges as it can. (If any of the members commenting believed that it couldn't be integrated at all or that it required changes that the project team was unwilling to agree to, then we have a process problem here. Fast-tracks can't be denied or have TCRs applied; that only happens with full cases, which means that a member needs to derail this in order to have a formal vote.) (Are you maybe jumping the gun? I suggest just reiterating exactly what you're intending to do in order to integrate, and asking if anyone wants to derail.) -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
