Thava Alagu wrote:
>
>   yes, the file lay out could change at anytime and we don't guarantee 
> or document
> the content structure.  This should probably then be classified as 
> "project private" as you mentioned
> instead of "uncommitted".  yes, the /etc/phppgadmin/config.inc.php is 
> public interface and I will add
> another line to explicitly clarify this. 

Ok sounds good.. thanks.

At this point only a nit remains but:
>         Files Layout within pkg        project private
it's not the layout "within the package", it's the layout after installation
under /usr/postgres/phppgadmin/*.  Should be obvious to readers, just
strange wording.


> >Merely delivering some php files doesn't add much value. Anyone could
> >download the phpPgAdmin tarball and untar it into their docroot about
> >as easily as typing "pkg install SUNWphpphadmin". The opportunity for
> >real value-add for OpenSolaris here is if you can also deliver
> >something that "just works". 
>  
>     I did take a look into this and found that we don't need another 
> predefined config file for phppgadmin
> comparable and similar to config modules in /etc/apache/2.2/conf.d.  We 
> bundle sun specific man page
> for phppgadmin where we describe how to configure phppgadmin with apache 
> with fairly simple couple
> of lines change in httpd.conf file.

Well, "need" isn't a great answer.  We also don't *need* to deliver this
package at all, users can easily enough download the tarball from the
web themselves.

It seems SUNWphppgadmin doesn't add much value above and beyond doing:
% wget http://downloads.sourceforge.net/phppgadmin/phpPgAdmin-4.2.tar.gz
% gtar xzf phpPgAdmin-4.2.tar.gz

Ok that's two steps vs one step ("pkg install SUNWphppgadmin") ;-)

Ease of use and out of box integration are top priorities for the Web
Stack project and there is an opportunity here to do more and do better.

ARC isn't the best forum for this design discussion. Unfortunately
this project came to ARC before a thorough discussion on the project
community, which would be the usual order.

I suggest:

- Set this case to "waiting need spec".
- Thava, take the discussion to webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org where
  we can explore the user experience details with the community.
- Then come back to close the case here in ARC.


-- 
Jyri J. Virkki - jyri.virkki at sun.com - Sun Microsystems

Reply via email to