On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 17:36 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Marcel Telka <Marcel.Telka at Sun.COM> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 17:07 +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > > Darren Reed <Darren.Reed at Sun.COM> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > /usr/sfw was fairly straightforward - where we installed software that
> > > > was bundled but not part of ON.  This was problematic for many because
> > > > the default paths of various environments do not include /usr/sfw.
> > > 
> > > For me, it would be important not to confuse /usr/sfw with /usr/gnu
> > > and to only put GNU (FSF) software into /usr/gnu and not arbitrary free
> > > software (even though this software may be under the GPL).
> >
> > If I understand it correctly you want to put GNU software into /usr/gnu
> > and non-GNU software under /usr/sfw. Then the question is what we will
> > do in case when some non-GNU software (placed in our /usr/sfw) becomes a
> > GNU software? Will we move the software into /usr/gnu or not?
> 
> Please explain to me why non-GNU software should be in /usr/gnu

No. Non-gnu should be in /usr/sfw. But sometimes non-GNU becomes GNU
(FSF adopt it as a GNU software). 

-- 
Marcel Telka


Reply via email to