On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 06:19:08PM +0000, Darren J Moffat wrote: > >This is still too vague. The disk-block size isn't called out (and the > >spec needs to be clearer about disk-block vs crypto-block differences). > >I could assume 512 bytes but I shouldn't need to. > > Okay I was assuming this was a given from the original lofi case and I > didn't need to respecficy it. I agree about the disk-block vs crypto-block.
The block size might be a good configurable option (e.g., to allow matching a ZFS filesystem/zvol's record size). OTOH, in this case more options -> worse UI. Nico --
