James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling writes:
> > Let us follow him and deny the approval for this case that would definitely
> > introduce CLI incompatibilities.
>
> Technically, it's not possible for the ARC to deny approval for a
> fast-track. Denials require a written opinion, and fast-tracks (by
> definition) don't have written opinions.
>
> The options are:
>
> - Timer expires and case is automatically approved.
>
> - Someone asks for more time to discuss an issue, and the timer is
> extended.
>
> - The case is marked "waiting need spec" and the timer is stopped
> because of some missing (and required) information.
>
> - The case is derailed by a full member for full review.
>
> I'd suggest convincing the project team, sponsor, or one of the
> members that there's a serious problem here.
>
> I would also suggest that questioning whether those folks are acting
> in good faith (breaking promises) or whether Sun itself is committed
> to open source or whether the participants in the discussion are
This seems to match my wishes.
I believe that the case cannot be handled as a fast track and needs futher
discussion in order to find a sulution that is globally acceptable.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
js at cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
