Joerg Schilling writes:
> If interface stability is really important for OpenSolaris, then tar(1), 
> cpio(1) and pax(1) cannot implement an incomatible way of handling the -/ 
> option. The option -/ (introduced in 1994) has the following meaning:

This is the point where there's a problem.

Your version of tar has no more to do with /usr/bin/tar on OpenSolaris
than does GNU tar, AIX tar, or any other implementation.

Yes, it'd be possible _in the future_ to create a project that removes
the OpenSolaris tar sources (and pax and cpio) and replaces them with
links to star.  Yes, it might even be helpful to do so.

However, that project doesn't currently exist.  There is no ARC case
that specifies it.  There's no plan showing when (or if) it will ever
show up.  All that we have is a hint in 2004/480 that this "might" be
a future project.

You're thus asking that we block an otherwise reasonable project on
the grounds that maybe -- someday -- there might be a conflict with
some other implementation.  How far does that extend?  How many other
people have created their own personal variants of common tools?
Should we survey them all, or do just yours alone matter?

The issue here isn't with time.  Whether you implemented this in 1994
or 1894 wouldn't make a difference here.  What does matter is whether
the change proposed here makes sense for OpenSolaris itself.

I'd like to hear from other ARC members and the original project team
on this issue, but I'm leaning towards letting the timer run on this
case.

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to