Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems wrote: >... >Solution >-------- > >We propose to add two macros to sys/ethernet.h: > > #define ETHERVTAGL 4 /* size of a VLAN tag */ > #define ETHERVLANMAX 1518 /* max tagged ethernet frame size */ > >Some existing macros that we tried to follow the naming style of: > > ETHERADDRL > ETHERFCSL > ETHERMAX > >We're not sure that the contents of sys/ethernet.h have ever been covered by an >ARC case, but we believe that these two macros could be added to the DDI and >given either Committed or Uncommitted binding so that 3rd party drivers could >begin using them. > >
Are you actually proposing that the above be committed/uncommitted? Or to ask this another way, is there any reason why these macros should not be published as being at least "uncommitted"? Darren
