> I'm sponsoring this case for Keith Wesolowski and myself. I believe
> it qualifies for self review and therefore have marked it "closed approved
> automatic." I'm happy to turn it into a fast track and set the timer if
> anyone believes I've misjudged.
So of course, I left out the release binding is unchanged as
is the interface taxonomy: Patch/Committed.
>
> Gary..
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Background:
> ===========
> PSARC/2007/177 SMF Read-Protected Property Storage specified the
> "read_authorization" property for property groups of type "application"
> (SCF_GROUP_APPLICATION). "application" is one of the predefined property
> group types. The other predefined types are "framework", "dependency",
> "method" and "template". SMF also provides for service bundles (manifests)
> to define other ``application-specific'' typed property groups as desired.
>
> Problem:
> ========
> As specified, only "application" typed property groups may be read
> protected. This was not the original case's intent.
>
> Solution:
> =========
> Extend the context of Read-Protected Property Storage to include
> application-specific typed property groups.
>
> "framework", "dependency", "method" and "template" typed property groups
> are part of the infrastructure and will not be permitted to be read
> protected.
>
