On Jan 23, 2008 6:17 AM, James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com> wrote:
> Freeman.Liu at Sun.COM writes:
> > >Do you intend to promote /dev/dsp to higher visibility in a future
> > >phase of the project?  If not, you should consider removing it and
> > >have references to it refer instead to the corresponding node in
> > >/devices (which already has private visibility).
> > >
> > >
> > Yes. Visibility and stability of /dev/dsp will be promoted in the
> > following phases.
>
> Given that /dev/dsp is a well-known name, and applications are quite
> likely to find it entirely by accident (for example, by way of
> ./configure tests), how will it be kept reasonably "private" until
> you're ready to expose it?

This would be my concern as well. Many "portable" audio libraries
check for the existence of this file and assume you have OSS if it
exists.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben

Reply via email to