Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:40:55AM -0800, Antonello Cruz wrote: >> Gary Winiger wrote: >>> What Rights Profile is being proposed to grant ctrun privilege? >> A new Rights Profile named "Process Contract Identifier" should be >> amended to this case. >> >>> And who should be granted this profile? >> Users who are responsible for creating service-like collections of >> processes that the administrator has decided should be identified >> separately from services started by SMF > > But will there be such users? It strikes me that this is a privilege > that only restarters will need, and those should be services themselves, > able to obtain this privilege straight from svc.startd. > > I.e., services that use ctrun to implement a restarter, or which use > librestart may need this privilege, and they should have that privilege > as part of the start method context. > > I can't imagine applications that are not SMF services requiring this > privilege (except, perhaps, for debugging). I can think of development of new restartes or services that create contracts, which probably falls in your debugging set.
> > So a rights profile to go with this privilege seems unnecessary. I agree it seems overkill to create a new Rights Profile. I don't feel strongly either way. What do others think? Antonello
