Nils Nieuwejaar wrote: > When this proposal was originally sent out, there was a bit of concern > expressed on this list about our intention to modify cmdk and possibly some > future drivers. Offline, I received some rather stronger objections to > this idea, so I have updated the proposal to address those concerns. > > Rather than modifying the existing cmdk, we are now proposing to create a > brand new cmdk that will only be used to access paravirtualized disk > drivers. This approach will leave the existing driver completely > untouched.
Please tell me you don't intend to take a copy of the cmdk source to do this ? Is this going to be a very simple driver that happens to have then name cmdk to take advantage of the fact that the driver name is baked in places ? -- Darren J Moffat
