On 9/22/06, Joseph Kowalski <Joseph.Kowalski at eng.sun.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the explanation, but the reason I'm inquiring is to determine > if the name libcmd is significant.
The name libcmd is significant because it is a library which can be referenced using builtin -f cmd commandname to load one of the commands located in libcmd. The name 'cmd' is a well known location to find those commands for dynamically linked versions of ksh93. Renaming the library will break existing scripts like our and this is not acceptable. Irek
