Darren J Moffat writes: > > Ahhggrll... ;-( > > I really like to avoid a "TCR" here and work in peace on a solution. > > This seems to be more complex and rushing any solution without propper > > investigation may lead to something which may even be worse than the > > current status (which is at least predictable and controlable for the > > developers of scripts). > > Another issue is that I don't know much about RBAC (and AFAIK neither > > David&Glenn do)... I first have to learn how it works in detail and > > which side-effects it has... > > Given this I HIGHLY recommend that this case does NOT introduce pfksh93. > It will be a requirement on the future case that makes the ksh93 code > base /usr/bin/ksh to have this issue resolved - how that should be done > can be taken offline and may not, depending on other OpenSolaris > projects, require any change to ksh93 code at all.
Indeed. That's exactly what I'd suggest the TCR say -- the project does not deliver pfksh93, as the exact semantics for pfksh93 aren't yet known. -- James Carlson, KISS Network <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
