Glenn Fowler wrote: > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:13:39 +0100 Darren J Moffat wrote: >> sh just doesn't do that though since it has no chmod(1) builtin this is >> never a problem in that codebase. The shell_builtins(1) man page on >> Solaris systems should be up to date on what is and is not builtin for >> what is currently being shipped. > > thanks > > we believe we have added the correct pfexec code to ksh93 > modulo the builtin calls ksh93 currently makes that pfexec says it shouldn't > does the rest look ok? > i.e., are the builtins that sidestep pfexec the only known problem?
It is the only problem with RBAC integration I'm aware of best on reading the specification presented in this ARC case. -- Darren J Moffat
