Felix Schulte wrote: > On 9/26/06, Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling at fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > > Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote: > > > April Chin wrote: > > > > An update from the project team on the pfksh93 issue... > > > > > > > > Although some ideas on disabling built-ins for pfksh93 > > > > has been proposed, the team has agreed to remove pfksh93 from the case, > > > > so we can investigate the correct solution carefully in a future case, > > > > without impeding this case. > > > > > > > > I will remove mention of pfksh93 and the -P and -o profile > > > > options from the proposed ksh93.1 and other manpages in the case > > > > materials. > > > > > > Thanks I'm happy with that outcome. Project team please seek the help > > > of the security community rather than trying to work this out on your > > > own. You can reach us at security-discuss at opensolaris.org > > > > If you remove pfhsh93, you make ksh93 a second class citizen > > and gives a bad start for ksh93. Don't do that, rather solve the problems. > Yeah. Removing it is a bad idea. I wish ARC would get some mind and > stop removing all cool features from ksh93 just because they don't > understand it.
xx@@@!!!-grumpf... ... ARC did not remove it. I asked to get it removed from the case since I feared that we rush in some kind of solution which may later bite back. Better we find a good solution which allows us to keep the builtins alive than disabling them all (which IMO very bad). BTW: You're fighting for a simple hardlink, nothing more. > Maybe they learn to do their homework before asking > stupid questions It would be VERY nice to stop these comments. Thanks... ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
