Joerg Schilling writes: > > It also doesn't mean we can't move on from where we are, providing that > > what ever we move to can still read archives created with the existing > > code base. > > Why did Sun move to somewhere from where it is hard to go to a better and > more standard conforming way although Sun did have the information on how > to do it better in the first attempt?
Sun is inanimate. Asking it questions won't produce useful results. I'm not even sure it's on this mailing list. You need to take your questions up with the _people_ who did that work, and perhaps propose something better along with a transition plan that gets us there. As for this particular case, I can't speak for the other ARC members, but I know I wasn't aware of your concerns about it at the time it was reviewed. -- James Carlson, KISS Network <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
