> There might be a problem if any consumer used a full path for OpenSSL > binary /usr/sfw/bin/openssl or libraries so that's another situation > that will have to be checked with all consumers.
[ my apologies, one additional question ] Besides the proposed symbolic link for /etc/sfw/openssl, does the project plan to introduce any others such as one for /usr/sfw/bin/openssl or other OpenSSL commands delivered under /usr/sfw/bin? dsc
