> Darren J Moffat wrote: > > There is only one taxonomy that is a problem and > that is the one named > > "Sun Private" there is no "OpenSolaris Private" > and neither should > > there be. The "Sun Private" taxonomy is *very > much* frowned on and is > > very very rarely allowed to be used, the reason > being it is actually > > identical to Committed (nee Stable) but without > documentation shipped > > outside of Sun - in an open source world this makes > even less sense > > that it ever did inside Sun. Its use is mostly > historical. > Sun Private means its use is allowed across multiple > Sun Products. At > the moment, their > may end up being multiple OpenSolaris Distros, but > ultimately there is > only one OpenSolaris > product. > > Yep, I intentionally didn't change the name when I > redid the taxonomy. > If OpenSolaris > ever somehow became multiple products (as Apache > seems to have done), > then we might > create and "OpenSolaris Private" level, but this > still wouldn't be a > rename of "Sun Private". >
I have to ask. How would you know when an OpenSolaris distribution crosses that magical threshold of becoming a product to define when "OpenSolaris Private" is allowable? ---Bob This message posted from opensolaris.org
