James Carlson wrote:
> ????? ???????????? writes:
>> I disagree. SFW is the trashcan repository of Opensolaris where people
>> invest little love for details. Software is integrated once and then
>> no one cares about the software - gcc, python, bash are prime examples
>> of neglect.
> 
> Feel free to volunteer some help to clean up whatever it is you think
> is "trashy," but your argument holds no architectural water.  There's
> no reason whatever to believe that the same unmodified source code
> will be magically worse if built inside SFW than if it were built in
> ON, or better simply because it's moved to ON.

In fact with OpenSSL I can actually prove that moving it out of ON into 
SFW will allow us to built it:
        * to a higher quality,
        * faster performing,
        * easier to keep up with critical security fixes
        * easier to maintain
        * allow building the OpenSSL FIPS container

-- 
Darren J Moffat

Reply via email to