Yes, it was an oversight that the sparc version was omitted. The update one pager is attached.
Thanks, Krish James Carlson wrote: > Sherry Moore writes: > >> /usr/bin/i86/latencytop committed >> /usr/bin/amd64/latencytop committed >> > > I assume that lack of SPARC here is just an oversight, right? > > Are you really planning to document the per-architecture binaries? > That's what "Committed" means. I don't think that's right, as I don't > see what someone could do usefully do with them. I would have > expected this instead: > > /usr/bin/latencytop Committed > /usr/bin/i86/latencytop Project Private > /usr/bin/amd64/latencytop Project Private > /usr/bin/sparcv9/latencytop Project Private > > >> Among non-SunOS man pages, xscreensaver(1), from the >> OpenWindows man pages. >> > > ? > > -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: one_pager.txt URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090604/a7b62fb8/attachment.txt>
