On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 10:09 -0700, David.Comay at sun.com wrote:
> However, it's my
> understanding that requiring the netmask will mean that configuring
> guest domains using our xVM implementation will differ from that of
> vendors using similar technology.
I'm a little surprised by this. can you expand on this or explain
further?
I'd imagine that one very common case is that the guest domain is given
an address on the same ip subnet as the host, in which case it would be
possible to for the host to unambiguously determine the correct subnet
mask for the guest based on the host's configuration.
But the guest can't figure this out on its own.
- Bill
