Garrett D'Amore writes: > > While this is all true, I disagree that we should break these interfaces > > in S10u5 - we can mark them Obsolete and provide legacy support for the > > ndd paths. > > > > I think that's what I said... mark them obsolete in S10u5, and maybe > remove them in Nevada.
That would be a good plan if this project had patch/micro release binding, but instead it has minor release binding. I don't think we should declare something to be "obsolete" in S10u5 unless users have something to which they can migrate. Otherwise, we're just saying "don't use this ... but don't use anything else, either." -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
