On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:43:57PM +0800, Vincent Wang wrote: > James Carlson wrote: > >We're responsible for the system as a whole, no matter where the parts > >come from. > > > You're supposed to review what the project team is doing. Not what > Intel has been doing. If you don't agree with Intel's design, you > cannot exclude it because it's already in the motherboard, and it > functions with or without Solaris installed.
Intel's design might be relevant to whether or not the service must be off by default, therefore it's relevant, though only in a tangential way (since there is nothing the ARC could do about the protocol if it didn't like it). > >The SOAP interfaces exposed by that proxy are programming interfaces, > >as is the kernel driver. > > > But the SOAP interface doesn't need to be approved by you. I think that's correct. But the port number and SOAP interfaces still need to be listed as a Volatile interface. (Not an ARC member.) Nico --
