A few quick comments on the Brussels case.
20q, question #8. I think the answer here should have been Yes, because
Brussels provides a consistent interface to NIC management, thereby
improving Serviceability. (Not impacting the R and A components of RAS,
though.)
20q, question #9. It appears that kstats are a Phase II deliverable.
Does it deserve mention here?
20q, question #10. I think that the security implication here is that
Brussels uses RBAC to control access to NIC configuration. That's not
precisely the same as "none".
The rest of it looks good.
I still want to address my issue of power management that I raised
separately earlier this week, during the review. I'm not sure whether
it is fair to edit the issues file in the commitment materials directory
or not? (Sorry, Brussels folk, you have the dubious distinction of
being the first case I've interned on to go for commitment review.)
-- Garrett
