Scott Rotondo wrote:
> The sheer volume of email and variety of questions suggests to me that 
> this case long ago passed the "obviousness" threshold for a fast-track.
>
> I'm not a PSARC member, but if I were, I'd be asking for a full review 
> at this point.
>
>     Scott

Fair enough.  Though to be completely honest, I think at least *part* of 
the problem stems from an incomplete understanding of the boundaries of 
what is being reviewed.  Hopefully at least *that* part is clear now.

A full review probably isn't a terrible idea, but I'll leave it to a 
PSARC member to derail on Wednesday, if that is appropriate.  (It is 
completely clear that this was not of scope for a self-review, though, I 
think.)

    -- Garrett

Reply via email to