Sebastien Roy wrote:
> Developers have noted some minor inconsistencies between what is in the
> case materials and opinion for this case and what the case actually
> delivered. They are:
>
> 1. The DL_IOC_IPNET_INFO ioctl was delivered as DLIOCIPNETINFO to match
> the rest of the DLPI ioctl namespace.
>
> 2. The NE_SET_ZONE net event was not delivered, as it was deemed to be
> unnecessary during code-review.
>
> Both of these issues are minor enough that I think it would be
> acceptable to update the materials (after having placed the appropriate
> documents under SCCS) and opinion to reflect what was delivered.
>
> Any objections?
>
> -Seb
>
>
>
Sounds good to me.
- Garrett
