Darren J Moffat wrote: > I reviewed this case and I'm happy with the changes it makes and the > requested release binding. This case appears very close to self > approved anyway in my opinion given the option already existed for > telnet. > > Will this change also be made upstream in the MIT code base ? I'm > just curious and the answer doesn't impact my opinion on the > architecture of this case being a good thing. > We've not offered it to MIT but it's a good idea so we'll offer it to them.
- PSARC/2008/572 Kerberos autologin for r-cmds Gary Winiger
- PSARC/2008/572 Kerberos autologin for r-cmds Darren J Moffat
- PSARC/2008/572 Kerberos autologin for r-cmds Glenn Barry
- PSARC/2008/572 Kerberos autologin for r-cmds James Carlson
- PSARC/2008/572 Kerberos autologin for r-cmds Glenn Barry
- PSARC/2008/572 Kerberos autologin for r-cmds Gary Winiger
