Garrett D'Amore wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: >> I'm happy with the responses and support the case as specified. >> >> -- >> Darren J Moffat > Its too bad you weren't at todays meeting then -- the case was extended > to cover your concerns. Can we get a quorum via e-mail to approve the > case ahead of timeout (I'm not sure there is precedent for this). Is > the project team OK with waiting another week for approval? (It > certainly appears that the project will be approved as specified.)
We are targeting b100 so the original timeout on Friday would be better for us. :-) I had asked at the meeting, that if Darren was OK with the responses, if it was OK to leave the timer on Friday.. I thought folks agreed to that, but I didn't see it in the status. Thanks, MRJ
