Michael Kearney wrote: > <html> > <head> > <title> Opinion: Eclipse For Java Developers </title>
A couple of quick comments, if I may. -- has Sun "proprietary" header... -- I'd like to see the 3 folks who had minority opinions listed. Or at least add my name, please -- Is the precedence list correct or a stub? I didn't see those cases listed on the published stuff.. If they are, you know I'm going to probably ask to open them (and I doubt I'll have much luck given the dates and sources) -- TCA/TCR (Appendix A/B), I had thought one of those was a TCA, but I may be mistaken.. I think #3, but I can't be sure now. -- "5.1 IPS" -> 5.2 -- The links at the bottom (Appendix C) -- mind relating them to the public portal? I'm assuming there'd be another revision coming with more in sections 4 and 6 (even if boilerplate), although I'd probably not say more if all the above get addressed. I do have a question out to the project team regarding packaging, but that is a separate issue.
