chenpu wrote: > Hi James, > > Thanks for the comments. > > James Carlson ??: > > >> Is Lucene delivered in a way that others can use it? Should it be? >> >> > Lucene will not be use on server side. That means it will not be > delivered to Opensolaris. >
Hmm, where is the server side source sitting? Seems sort of like delivering a closed project to me, or perhaps 1/2 closed. As James mentioned, what about admins who want to run this inside a firewall? >> That helps, but what case describes the rest of the project? Should >> this case be dependent on (or at least reference) the rest of the >> project? >> >> I still don't quite see how the proposed project is "obvious" enough >> to be a fast-track. Why not run a full case for it? >> >> > Thanks for the suggestion, James. Can you help to be sponsor for this > case? Or we can get somebody's help on this? > I'll volunteer to intern. > Regards, > Jeffrey > > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-arc mailing list > opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org
