Hello LSARC reviewers! I need to close this LSARC case (we have agreement on package structure).
I suppose that foss checklist needs to be updated: http://sac.eng.sun.com/Archives/CaseLog/arc/LSARC/2008/642/fosslist.txt The new version of section 4.0 is below: 4.0 Interfaces (see http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/interface-taxonomy/ for details) 4.1 Exported Interfaces Interface Name Classification Comments ----------------------------- ------------------- --------------------------- SUNWfindbugs committed package name /usr/bin/findbugs uncommitted command /usr/share/doc/findbugs uncommitted documentation and license /usr/share/findbugs/bin uncommitted additional findbugs' commands /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs uncommitted findbugs' private libraries /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs.jar uncommitted findbugs' exported library /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs-ant.jar uncommitted findbugs' exported library 4.2 Imported Interfaces Interface Name Classification Comments --------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------- JAVA_HOME committed environment variable (widely used) FindBugs require Java 1.5 or later. Is this section OK this way? Just FYI, the whole package structure is the following: /usr/bin/findbugs /usr/share/doc/findbugs /usr/share/doc/findbugs/LICENSE.txt /usr/share/doc/findbugs/README.txt /usr/share/doc/findbugs/<html-documents> /usr/share/doc/findbugs/manual/<html-documents> /usr/share/findbugs /usr/share/findbugs/bin /usr/share/findbugs/bin/addMessages /usr/share/findbugs/bin/computeBugHistory /usr/share/findbugs/bin/convertXmlToText /usr/share/findbugs/bin/copyBuggySource /usr/share/findbugs/bin/defectDensity /usr/share/findbugs/bin/deprecated /usr/share/findbugs/bin/deprecated/bugHistory /usr/share/findbugs/bin/deprecated/unionBugs /usr/share/findbugs/bin/deprecated/unionResults /usr/share/findbugs/bin/deprecated/updateBugs /usr/share/findbugs/bin/fbwrap /usr/share/findbugs/bin/filterBugs /usr/share/findbugs/bin/findbugs /usr/share/findbugs/bin/findbugs2 /usr/share/findbugs/bin/listBugDatabaseInfo /usr/share/findbugs/bin/mineBugHistory /usr/share/findbugs/bin/printAppVersion /usr/share/findbugs/bin/printClass /usr/share/findbugs/bin/rejarForAnalysis /usr/share/findbugs/bin/setBugDatabaseInfo /usr/share/findbugs/bin/unionBugs /usr/share/findbugs/bin/xpathFind /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/annotations-1.3.4.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/asm-3.1.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/asm-analysis-3.1.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/asm-commons-3.1.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/asm-tree-3.1.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/asm-util-3.1.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/asm-xml-3.1.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/bcel-5.3.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/dom4j-1.6.1.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/findbugs-1.3.4.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/findbugs-ant-1.3.4.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs-ant.jar -> findbugs/findbugs-ant-1.3.4.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs.jar -> findbugs/findbugs-1.3.4.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/jaxen-1.1.1.jar /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/jsr-305.jar Could we consider this LSARC case as approved? If not, please let me know what else should be done. Thanks! Petr Danek Duvall wrote: > On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 07:53:13PM +0100, Petr Slechta wrote: > > >> [ ... ] >> /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/dom4j-1.6.1.jar >> /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/findbugs-1.3.4.jar >> /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/findbugs-ant-1.3.4.jar >> /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs-ant.jar -> findbugs/findbugs-ant-1.3.4.jar >> /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs.jar -> findbugs/findbugs-1.3.4.jar >> /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/jaxen-1.1.1.jar >> /usr/share/lib/java/findbugs/jsr-305.jar >> >> Is it OK this way? >> > > This looks fine to me. > > Danek >
