Darren J Moffat wrote: > Since this proposed behaviour is the default for ACLs on UFS why isn't > it the default for ZFS too ?
I'm more than willing to make this the default behavior for ZFS, but it will affect POSIX compliance. If thats alright with everyone then I can change it to be the default. > > Also shouldn't "secure" be "posix" because "secure" is subjective and > relative. > secure is what it was called in the original ZFS ARC case. I can change it to "posix" if you want. My only concern would be if users have become accustomed to its present value. > Is changing the default value of aclinherit considered to painful ? No, this is actually a very small code change. > > -- > Darren J Moffat
