Peter Memishian wrote:
>         # pfiles `pgrep rpc`
>         100395: /usr/sbin/rpcbind
>           [ ... ]
>           19: S_IFCHR mode:0000 dev:333,0 ino:44170 uid:0 gid:0 rdev:105,27
>               O_RDWR
>               /devices/pseudo/tl at 0:ticots
>           20: S_IFCHR mode:0000 dev:333,0 ino:65028 uid:0 gid:0 rdev:42,35
>               O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK FD_CLOEXEC
>   -->           sockname: AF_INET 10.8.57.32  port: 111
>   -->           peername: AF_INET 10.8.57.11  port: 61404
>               /devices/pseudo/tcp at 0:tcp

jgh1) What is the stability level of the proposed output from pfiles(1) ?

jgh2) Will it support IPv6?

jgh3) Is there any interaction with PSARC/2008/257 sockets-direct?


Finally, though I'm fully in favour of this proposal:

>   For historical reasons, a number of critical Solaris daemons still use
>   TLI instead of sockets (e.g., 8 of the 55 processes running on my Nevada
>   desktop after boot have TLI endpoints).

Is there any intent to eventually move these TLI uses over to sockets?
(Not part of this case).

Cheers,
   Jeremy Harris                           jgh at wizmail.org

Reply via email to