Cynthia McGuire <cindi at sac.sfbay.sun.com> writes:

[dropping zfs-eng from Cc, since this isn't a comment on the material
presented]

> This case seeks patch release binding.
>
> Cindi
>
> This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
> 1. Introduction
>     1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
>        ZFS failmode FMA
>     1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
>        Author:  Eric Kustraz
>     1.3  Date of This Document:
>       16 April, 2008
> 4. Technical Description
> See the materials in the case directory.
>
> 6. Resources and Schedule
>     6.4. Steering Committee requested information
>       6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name:
>               ON
>     6.5. ARC review type: Automatic
>     6.6. ARC Exposure: open

This case is exposure: open, but the case materials mentioned are not
published to opensolaris.org (I suspect because they have
confidentiality markings).

If the material really is confidential, surely this case (such as it
is) should be exposure: closed (with associated justification).

If the material isn't confidential, it too should be exposed.

This seems especially common with self-reviewed FMA cases, is there
perhaps some boilerplate text in a template you're using that should
be selectively excised?

Thanks,

-- Rich

Reply via email to