>>>> Feel free to accost said mangler when he returns O:-)
>>>>
>>> I'm not sure what the reasons are, or if they really matter
>>> unless the architecture is wrong and then I'd leave that up
>>> to the Case Owner and the Case Submitter to work out before
>>> submitting the Fast Track.
This is an important point.
There is an explicit expectation that the fasttrack Sponsor
has reviewed the fasttrack and convinced themselves that it
is indeed fasttrack material (obvious and non controversial)
AND that the proposal being submitted is a true and complete
description of the project itself.
The reason the ARC can get by with a somewhat superficial
email review for fasttracks is /because/ they rely on the
Sponsor to do a good job with the above. If the Sponsor
doesn't do their job well, everyone suffers. This includes
saying no when asked to sponsor something that is incomplete.
-John
