Garrett D'Amore wrote: > And the rationale is quite simple -- more code in Solaris == more > effort to sustain, support, larger install image, bigger download, > generally more "bloat". I disagree.
I strongly *suspect* it is less effort to "sustain, support" the plethora of FOSS ftp versions by minimizing the changes to that version, including a proposed "wrapper" implementation. I agree with John here. Let's not make this into a big, <expletive deleted> thread. There is clearly nothing wrong about having the multiple implementations. Support is an issue, and we have some input, but ultimately. this isn't architecture. (Yea, "size" does matter (image size, download size), but IMHO its in the noise.) - jek3
