James Carlson wrote: > OK; I think I see it now. If someone sets the rctl to a value that > doesn't "map" into the simplified property, then he won't be able to > use the simplified version. > > They are _not_ different things. They're just user-syntactic bits > over top of a single (rctl) mechanism.
James, Yes, that is correct. Thats why we chose the term 'rctl alias' to try to describe this. We needed to do it this way for backward compatibility, so there is a compatibility issue, but that came up in 2006/496, not in this case. Thanks, Jerry
