Darren J Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> wrote: > I'm happy with the case as specified. Initially I missed how this would > actually be requested but on second reading I saw that the caller passes > the V_RDDIR_ACCFILTER flag. > > Is this case intended to modify the CIFS server to pass this flag or is > there another case for that ?
That will be a different case, which will follow after approval of this case. I felt it would simplify the dependencies and test matrix for each case to keep them separate. > I think there is a possibly interesting (to some people anyway) RFE in > here for local ZFS filesystems. A per dataset property that enables > this behaviour. Not this case though. Enabling this property on local file systems may have undesirable side effects. For example, backup/archiving applications may inadvertently miss files (because the directory content visible to applications is not dependent solely on having directory read permission with ABE enabled). I don't think Windows allows ABE to be enabled on local file systems, it is only available on shares. Alan > Regardless of the answers to the above I'm happy with it as specified. > > -- > Darren J Moffat >
