John Plocher wrote: > Ali Bahrami wrote: >> Note that there are two emacs variants in wide use, GNU emacs, >> and Xemacs. This case is for GNU emacs only. > > >> SUNWemacs >> SUNWemacs-el >> SUNWemacs-x >> SUNWemacs-nox > > > Given that there will probably also be a call for having Xemacs, > wouldn't it be better to use package names that make it obvious > which one this is? Maybe SUNWgnuemacs or GNUemacs or .... > > -John > _______________________________________________ > opensolaris-arc mailing list > opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org
GNU emacs is usually referred to as 'emacs', while Xemacs is 'xemacs'. My assumption is that the Xemacs packages would therefore be SUNWxemacs-*. I agree that it's subtle, but this is the way those commands are commonly named, and I was following that pattern. The description lines in the GNU packages all say "GNU emacs", which should help to make it more obvious, and I would hope that the Xemacs package descriptions would be equally explicit. That should largely address any confusion. Although I would rather leave these as described, I am open to a change if the ARC feels it to be necessary. - Ali
