On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 09:28:47AM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > 3) However, the whole project itself is IMO dubious, since the *data* > itself is not stable, and can't be relied upon. [...]
I don't agree. Applications can check for the existence of the kstat they want. If a kstat changes semantics without changing it's name, then that is bad. We may want to discourage kstat semantics changes without name changes. The same applies to SNMP, by the way. Nico --
