On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:51:52PM +0800, Aaron Zang wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 05:22:15PM -0700, Gary Winiger wrote: > >>The project team now considers the "rootunlock" property as unnecessary > >>because: > > > >Hmmm, and what if root has no password? > > Here we are proposing to eliminate the "rootunlock" property. So if without > the "rootunlock" property, user can not unlock the screen using root > password. > It does not matter if root has password or not. > > Or I didn't understand your question correctly.
What I meant is that the prospect of root not having a password too makes rootunlock pointless :) Nico --
