Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>
>> Of course, a switch to use PKCS#11 directly will render this option
>> obsolete. So, what is the interface stability of this option? (I
>> propose Obsolete Committed.)
>
> Nope, for now it is Committed. If we do direct calls to PKCS#11 then
> that case will deal with what to do with the options introduced in
> this case (likely mark them Obsolete and silently ignore them).
And, I'm happy with that since the option offers no semantic difference
in behavior, only a performance optimization benefit.
-- Garrett
